Archive for the ‘Political Correctness’ Category

Confessions of A Mobile Communicator (Pt. 2)

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

Thanks to all who pointed out the following information to me that I think is best summed up in this article from Friday’s Indianapolis Star .  After becoming even more educated on this bill, I have to really take the politically incorect stance and ask what did this really resolve?   Seems like to me basically the issue remains and the solution is to address bad driving.  Just an idea- how about a well known phone number that a driver can call to report a dangerous driver?

Here is the additional scoop on House Enrolled Act 1129:

1. Surfing the web has not been outlawed.  So, use your Facebook chat and inbox if you want to stay in the law.  Check your Facebook account and stay updated.  Use your apps to review the weather radar.  And never be without Angry Birds.  All perfectly legal.   Do I need to say more?

2. If a law enforcement officer pulls you over and asks to see your phone, you DO NOT have to hand it over.  I am a normally law abiding citizen, but I will not be handing my phone over to any officer.

3. You may read and write texts and emails when sitting at a stoplight.

Yes, I am scared of the reckless people who text and email while driving on the narrow roads by my home.  I do not know if this happens but I assume it does.   I use better judgement than that and it is not due to a new law.  I am relieved to hear I can continue to respond and address others at stop lights.  That is where the majority of my “mobile communicating” occurs.  Obviously, this law primarily provides further awareness of the issue and allows law enforcement to address reckless driving when apparent that a person is distracted with a mobile device.  For that alone it does have value.  The fact it is so limited in scope seems certain to me to make it much less likely the tool will be used unless it is blatently obvious that texting or email is causing reckless driving, and you hand over your phone as evidence.

The End of Men

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

I hate to say I am not surprised, but I am not.  The Atlantic offers a piece this month titled “The End of Men: How Women Are Taking Control of Everything” and it is a nice blow to the man’s super ego!  The story summary:

Earlier this year, women became the majority of the workforce for the first time in U.S. history. Most managers are now women too. And for every two men who get a college degree this year, three women will do the same. For years, women’s progress has been cast as a struggle for equality. But what if equality isn’t the end point? What if modern, postindustrial society is simply better suited to women? A report on the unprecedented role reversal now under way— and its vast cultural consequences.

I am looking around my neighborhood and see numerous men who have been out of work for a year or more.  Their wives are the bread winners and they are home taking care of the family and house.   For one thing this recession has created an environment where the higher priced middle age men were the ones let go.  In the meantime, I am a witness to the business advantages being offered company’s owned by anybody other than a male (and while this is not a post about race, all the disclosures I am exposed to also ask my race so I think it must be acceptable to add the classification “white” to the group affected).  So, in addition to the societal advantages this article so aptly exposes, there is also an orchestrated direction in our society to move women (and other groups) in front of  (white) men in the food chain. The two factors combined explain why so many men may be permanently out of the work force as we once knew it.

Regarding the societal changes-some outtakes from this article that are relevant.

“Men seem ‘fixed in cultural aspic.’ With each passing day, they lag further behind.” Numerous college women assume they’ll be primary bread winner; guys “are the new ball and chain.”

“As thinking and communicating have come to eclipse physical strength and stamina as the keys to economic success, those societies that take advantage of the talents of all their adults, not just half of them, have pulled away from the rest.”

“The evidence is all around you [e.g.] in the wreckage of the Great Recession, in which three-quarters of the eight million jobs lost were lost by men. The worst-hit industries were overwhelmingly male and deeply identified with macho: construction, manufacturing, high finance.”

“Of the 15 job categories projected to grow the most in the next decade in the U.S., all but two are occupied primarily by women.”

“Women hold 51.4% of managerial and professional jobs—up from 26.1% in 1980. … In 1970, women contributed 2 to 6 percent of the family income. Now the typical working wife brings home 42.2%—and four in 10 mothers are the primary breadwinners in their family.”

“What’s clear is that schools, like the economy, now value the self-control, focus and verbal aptitude that seem to come more easily to young girls.”

If you have raised boys and girls, this last point brings all of this home in a different light than just blaming cost-cutting and diversification efforts.  The information age we now live in favors the skill sets of women.  It is part of their genetics..better communicators, better understanding of a problem, more focused.   If you are raising a boy today, it may be the greatest gift you can give to allow them to absorb the skill sets that involve the characteristics that are those of great communicators,organizers, and disciplinarians.   Boys have been raised, and continue to be raised, to excel on the playing field and in stiff competition.  We, as the American society, reward our boys for success on the football field, and tend to overlook failure in Composition classes.  Girls, this is reversed.  Where is your child’s future?

If this article is correct, for the first time boy’s are now arriving in the future at a disadvantage.  I see evidence of this change everywhere.  Better consider the affect of your priorities on your son’s.  Very few of them are ever going to play a sport after high school, and fewer yet will ever receive a dime for their athleticism.

This article is a wake up call.   Not much you can do if you are a middle aged (white) guy like me, but you sure can recognize what the world will look like for your children.

PC Mistakes That Tarnish An Entire Group

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Maybe the National Association of Realtors (NAR) would like to spend a little time today trying to perform some damage control.  I think they better.

Here is this idiot property manager, working for an idiot property management company who tells a Army Vet of Iraq and Afghanistan that he and his wife are not allowed to display an American flag at their rented home (see picture in this post) due to a company policy that bans the display of flags, banners and political or religious materials. 

The idiotic political correctness of this scenario is reflected in the public statement made by the management company to the local newspaper: 

“This policy was developed to insure that we are fair to everyone as we have many residents from diverse backgrounds,” the statement read. “By having a blanket policy of neutrality we have found that we are less likely to offend anyone and the aesthetic qualities of our apartment communities are maintained.”

Excuse me..are we now so worried about our global appearance that we do not allow our brave men and women (or anybody for that matter) to show their loyalty and respect for our country because we are afraid of offending somebody?  Somebody living on our soil?    This story is beyond political correctness.  Unfortunately, it says so much about the fear we all are forced to live with in a country more concerned with providing illegal aliens rights, that are different than the ones of our natives, that we make bonehead decisions to avoid conflict.

The other side of the story is that a 2005 federal law called the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act for some reason exluded renters..thereby opening this loophole for an eviction threat.  Nevertheless, the response of the management company in a press release has me scratching my head as to whether they really believe what they said?  Laws can be fixed…but this way of thinking seems to have grasped our country in its public speech and statements.  Why not just say that  a display of a flag is against the rules of the building and the law allows the owner to make such rules.  That would be bad enough.  Instead they use the excuse of political correctness and not offending anybody.

If this management company is a member of NAR, NAR should get involved and tell them to stop giving our group a bad name and beyond that..use a little logic in your business practices.  I picked up this story on Fox News.  There is a 2000+ and growing Facebook group, and nothing good will come from this ridiculous display of political correctness.

Are you with me on this?