Archive for the ‘Jobs’ Category

Times Are Changing..Better Let Your Sons Know!

Friday, December 9th, 2011

In case you are raising boys, and are not a middle age man, what I am going to share may be news to you.  Men are now our parents women.  Huh?  Basically, as time has gone on, and society advanced past the industrial age, women are now better suited for many, if not most, professions in todays world.  You may be thinking I am being cyncial but the evidence is piling up.  And we better start recognizing it as we raise our sons.   The old ways just are not going to cut it in this brave new world.

In 2010 women became the majority of the workforce for the first time in American history.   There are now three women graduating from college for every two men.   I think we can stop arguing for equality-except pay is not quite there but it is approaching equillibrium.  Our culture has created this disparity in a totally unplanned manner.  Even certain Asian countries now place an emphasis on young parents birthing girls.

Why?  In the post-industrial world thinking and communication skills have more value than brute strength for economic success.   Of course, women have always been programmed to be better communicators than men.

The result?  During the last five years, 75% of the jobs lost were held by men.  Think about the industries that have been significantly hurt in this recession and how male-oriented they are.  Manufacturing, construction, finance.   The reason we need to start teaching our boys differently is for their future in the world of employment.  Just a few of them are going to make $254 million over 10 years (aka Albert Pujols).  I think we all believe the future for our boys might be in being paid to play games.  Reality says we better realize our boys chances of being paid to play is very, very slim.  Chances are much better they will get paid to provide a service.  Of the 15 job categories projected to grow over the next decade, all but two are women dominated fields.  In fact, the fastest growing job fields are dominated with services that formerly were performed by women in the home, and can be scaled into successful businesses.  Think home health care and food preparation.   Even the education system values the skill sets that come more easily to girls (verbal skills, focus, and slef-control).  We can’t reprogram our boys, but we need to with awareness direct them toward the future.

The self-reliance of woman is now evidenced by delaying or postponing marriage.  Why haul along a husband who may earn much less, and is not profecient at housekeeping skills also?  Maybe the least we can do is make our sons learn some domestic skills that we naturally avoid for boys, but encourage for girls.

What made me think about this today is the news from Purdue that the College of Engineering has set a new record for women enrollment.  Since 2007, the first year female population has grown by 42%!  In this traditionally male field, women easily could succeed once the sterotypes are set aside, and the way the learning takes place adjusts from lecture to more group oriented.  That is what Purdue is doing and the result is one more avenue that women could become equal, if not dominant.

I have three daughters and I am happy for all of these opportunities that the world will provide for them.  I also have two sons and the traditional world for boys, that I grew up in, and they are a part of, is lacking in really preparing them for the skills they are going to need.  As parents we have to start to recognize this.  While we can toss off certain behaviors with “boys will be boys” we may want to ask whether we really want them to be.

(Many of the facts referenced in this post came from an amazing story in The Atlantic magazine title “The End of Men”.  I suggest you read it.)

The End of Men

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

I hate to say I am not surprised, but I am not.  The Atlantic offers a piece this month titled “The End of Men: How Women Are Taking Control of Everything” and it is a nice blow to the man’s super ego!  The story summary:

Earlier this year, women became the majority of the workforce for the first time in U.S. history. Most managers are now women too. And for every two men who get a college degree this year, three women will do the same. For years, women’s progress has been cast as a struggle for equality. But what if equality isn’t the end point? What if modern, postindustrial society is simply better suited to women? A report on the unprecedented role reversal now under way— and its vast cultural consequences.

I am looking around my neighborhood and see numerous men who have been out of work for a year or more.  Their wives are the bread winners and they are home taking care of the family and house.   For one thing this recession has created an environment where the higher priced middle age men were the ones let go.  In the meantime, I am a witness to the business advantages being offered company’s owned by anybody other than a male (and while this is not a post about race, all the disclosures I am exposed to also ask my race so I think it must be acceptable to add the classification “white” to the group affected).  So, in addition to the societal advantages this article so aptly exposes, there is also an orchestrated direction in our society to move women (and other groups) in front of  (white) men in the food chain. The two factors combined explain why so many men may be permanently out of the work force as we once knew it.

Regarding the societal changes-some outtakes from this article that are relevant.

“Men seem ‘fixed in cultural aspic.’ With each passing day, they lag further behind.” Numerous college women assume they’ll be primary bread winner; guys “are the new ball and chain.”

“As thinking and communicating have come to eclipse physical strength and stamina as the keys to economic success, those societies that take advantage of the talents of all their adults, not just half of them, have pulled away from the rest.”

“The evidence is all around you [e.g.] in the wreckage of the Great Recession, in which three-quarters of the eight million jobs lost were lost by men. The worst-hit industries were overwhelmingly male and deeply identified with macho: construction, manufacturing, high finance.”

“Of the 15 job categories projected to grow the most in the next decade in the U.S., all but two are occupied primarily by women.”

“Women hold 51.4% of managerial and professional jobs—up from 26.1% in 1980. … In 1970, women contributed 2 to 6 percent of the family income. Now the typical working wife brings home 42.2%—and four in 10 mothers are the primary breadwinners in their family.”

“What’s clear is that schools, like the economy, now value the self-control, focus and verbal aptitude that seem to come more easily to young girls.”

If you have raised boys and girls, this last point brings all of this home in a different light than just blaming cost-cutting and diversification efforts.  The information age we now live in favors the skill sets of women.  It is part of their genetics..better communicators, better understanding of a problem, more focused.   If you are raising a boy today, it may be the greatest gift you can give to allow them to absorb the skill sets that involve the characteristics that are those of great communicators,organizers, and disciplinarians.   Boys have been raised, and continue to be raised, to excel on the playing field and in stiff competition.  We, as the American society, reward our boys for success on the football field, and tend to overlook failure in Composition classes.  Girls, this is reversed.  Where is your child’s future?

If this article is correct, for the first time boy’s are now arriving in the future at a disadvantage.  I see evidence of this change everywhere.  Better consider the affect of your priorities on your son’s.  Very few of them are ever going to play a sport after high school, and fewer yet will ever receive a dime for their athleticism.

This article is a wake up call.   Not much you can do if you are a middle aged (white) guy like me, but you sure can recognize what the world will look like for your children.

Unemployed? Unhappy With Your Wages? Get Rich Working for Obama!

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

I guess it goes without saying that many of the job creation opportunities that were formerly a part of the private sector are today mostly on hold.   Wonder why?  How about taking a look at how difficult it is for private employers to compete with the public sector?  Data compiled by the US Commerce Department now shows the extent of the pay gap between federal and private workers.  And the difference is more than a little disturbing for anybody in the private sector trying to grow a business.

An editorial last week in the Washington Examiner titled “Want to get rich? Work for feds” reveals that the Commerce Department study shows the average federal salary in 2008 was $119,982 compared with the average private sector employee salary of $59,909.  Yes…TWICE as much!  So, if you are not a little upset by this news…add this spicy bit of fact.   The average federal worker also receives $40,785 in additional compensation in the form of benefits like health care and pensions.  The private sector average?  A measly $9,881!

What does this say about the challenges in creating jobs in the private sector?  How about American competitiveness?  What about deficit spending?  Seems like we have discovered an easy way to trim some fat.  Unless of course your objectives are to grow the public sector and make it the employer of choice?  Look, I recognize this is not a partisan dig toward one party or the other.  Though the current people running the show are surely not helping this disparity and we know government is where the jobs are.   I think it alarms me as a private employer and a citizen.   Additionally, have you ever considered just what these people in the federal government do for their nice wages? 

Maybe you have.  Maybe you are mad.  Maybe you will start to pay attention to what the politicians say.  Who is willing to return this country to an economic giant status?  Growing from the inside?  Who?  Or is it just too hard once you join the team?